After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures across Europe, fresh technologies are now reviving these types of systems. Via lie diagnosis tools tested at the border to a program for verifying documents and transcribes selection interviews, a wide range of technology is being included in asylum applications. This article is exploring how these solutions have reshaped the ways asylum procedures happen to be conducted. It reveals just how asylum seekers will be transformed into forced hindered techno-users: They are asked to conform to a series of techno-bureaucratic steps also to keep up with unforeseen tiny within criteria and deadlines. This obstructs the capacity to navigate these systems and to follow their right for security.
It also shows how these kinds of technologies happen to be embedded in refugee governance: They facilitate the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a whirlwind of spread technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity simply by hindering these people from interacting with the programs of protection. It www.ascella-llc.com/counseling-services-for-students/ further states that studies of securitization and victimization should be combined with an insight into the disciplinary mechanisms for these technologies, by which migrants will be turned into data-generating subjects who are disciplined by their reliance on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal expertise, the article argues that these systems have an inherent obstructiveness. There is a double impact: whilst they assist to expedite the asylum procedure, they also help to make it difficult pertaining to refugees to navigate these types of systems. They are simply positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes them vulnerable to illegitimate decisions of non-governmental celebrities, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their cases. Moreover, that they pose fresh risks of’machine mistakes’ that may result in erroneous or discriminatory outcomes.